A Response to “Study:Organic Foods Not Healthier Than Non-Organic”
September 3, 2008
Have you read about the new study by the University of Copenhagen? This study has revealed that organic foods contained no more nutrients than non-organic foods grown with the use of pesticides.
To quote the article: “No systematic differences between cultivation systems representing organic and conventional production methods were found across the five crops [carrots, kale, mature peas, apples and potatoes], so the study does not support the belief that organcially grown foodstuffs generally contain more major and trace elements than conentionally grown foodstuffs. It should be noted that the study does not make conclusions about the comparative levels of pesticides or chemicals in conventionally and organically grown food, or the health effects of consuming such chemicals”.
I’ve heard this arguement against organics 30 years ago. And you know what? I’m not surprised at all. Seeds grown in nutrient deficient soils will be nutrient deficient, whether farmed with chemicals or without. If there is a lack of a certain trace mineral in the soil, how can the plant take it up? If there is no bacterial or fungi life in the soil, how can the minerals make it into the plant? Organic agriculture has never made the claim that organic produce is more nutrient dense. That claim can only be made when one farms to improve the soil life (bacteria and fungi) and provide the minerals necessary for health. All health starts with the soil, not the plant. As a consumer, it is your responsibility to check out the source of your foods. Look your farmer in the eye and ask them what they do to improve soil health. Your farmer should be doing everything in their power to cultivate bacteria and fungi (green manures, animal compost, foliar feeding, compost teas), and add missing nutrients back into the soil. Remember, there are 83 known trace minerals. Life cannot exist on N (nitrogen), P (phosporous) and K (potassium) alone.
Feeding By-products From Ethanol Industry An Attractive Option
January 19, 2008
Snippet from The Wisconsin State Farmer, January 18, 2008
Kay’s note: Does anyone else see a parallel between the distillery dairies back in the 20′s and this?
“The roll of ethanol and biodiesel – as fuel sources and co-product feeds for the livestock industry – is growing. With traditional feed prices on the rise, feeding byproducts from the growing ethanol industry is becoming an attractive option – assuming producers resolve the fiber and unsaturated fat challenges.”
FDA rules on safety of meat, milk from clones
January 19, 2008
Snippets from The Wisconsin State Journal, January 18, 2008
Kay’s note: Organic products (milk, meat, etc.) are NOT allowed to be from cloned animals.
“After years of debate, the US Food and Drug Administration officially ruled this week that meat and milk from cloned animals is safe.”
“But while one US official made the safety announcement, another asked owners of cloned animals to continue a ‘voluntary moratorium’ until market acceptance catches up with the scientific safety assessment.”
“Trade officials were reportedly critical of the FDA’s assessment as the agency prepared to release it to the public, knowing that products from clones are a tough sell to some US export markets, notably Japan and Europe.”
Get Updates by Email